- Home >
- Services >
- Access to Knowledge >
- Trend Monitor >
- Source of threat >
- Trend snippet: External actors are the most involved actors regarding cyber-espionage
Trends in Security Information
The HSD Trendmonitor is designed to provide access to relevant content on various subjects in the safety and security domain, to identify relevant developments and to connect knowledge and organisations. The safety and security domain encompasses a vast number of subjects. Four relevant taxonomies (type of threat or opportunity, victim, source of threat and domain of application) have been constructed in order to visualize all of these subjects. The taxonomies and related category descriptions have been carefully composed according to other taxonomies, European and international standards and our own expertise.
In order to identify safety and security related trends, relevant reports and HSD news articles are continuously scanned, analysed and classified by hand according to the four taxonomies. This results in a wide array of observations, which we call ‘Trend Snippets’. Multiple Trend Snippets combined can provide insights into safety and security trends. The size of the circles shows the relative weight of the topic, the filters can be used to further select the most relevant content for you. If you have an addition, question or remark, drop us a line at info@securitydelta.nl.
visible on larger screens only
Please expand your browser window.
Or enjoy this interactive application on your desktop or laptop.
External actors are the most involved actors regarding cyber-espionage
Actors over time
For the 2014-2020 DBIR timeframe, External actors have dominated Actor types, ranging from 69% to 88% over this timeframe, with Internal actors a distant second, ranging from 12% to 34% over the same timeframe.
When we look at Cyber-Espionage breaches for the 2014- 2020 DBIR timeframe, External actors (State-affiliated, Nation-state, Organized crime, Former employee and Competitor combined) are at 100%. This makes sense, as within VERIS, Cyber-Espionage threat actors are coded as External actors in all breaches.
Actor varieties
Attempting to identify Actor varieties is an immense challenge in cyberspace. Threat actors go to great lengths to maintain anonymity, obfuscate their activities and impede identification using bogus IP addresses (even MAC addresses can be spoofed), domain names, email addresses, file names and malware tools, among other indicators of compromise (IoCs).
The top Actor varieties in Cyber-Espionage breaches for the 2014-2020 DBIR timeframe are State-affiliated (85%), Nation-state (8%), Organized crime (4%) and Former employee (2%). This should be no surprise, as State-affiliated and Nation-state threat actors align more with the Espionage motive.
For all breaches during this same timeframe, we see a bit of a different picture, with Organized crime (59%) dominating the list of Actor varieties, followed by State-affiliated (13%), Unaffiliated (7%), and then End-user (6%) and System admin (4%). Organized crime has been identified mainly with the Financial motive, one that continues to dominate our DBIR dataset for all breaches over the years.