- Home >
- Services >
- Access to Knowledge >
- Trend Monitor >
- Type of Threat or Opportunity >
- Trend snippet: Technological limitations of AI usage for law enforcement agencies
Trends in Security Information
The HSD Trendmonitor is designed to provide access to relevant content on various subjects in the safety and security domain, to identify relevant developments and to connect knowledge and organisations. The safety and security domain encompasses a vast number of subjects. Four relevant taxonomies (type of threat or opportunity, victim, source of threat and domain of application) have been constructed in order to visualize all of these subjects. The taxonomies and related category descriptions have been carefully composed according to other taxonomies, European and international standards and our own expertise.
In order to identify safety and security related trends, relevant reports and HSD news articles are continuously scanned, analysed and classified by hand according to the four taxonomies. This results in a wide array of observations, which we call ‘Trend Snippets’. Multiple Trend Snippets combined can provide insights into safety and security trends. The size of the circles shows the relative weight of the topic, the filters can be used to further select the most relevant content for you. If you have an addition, question or remark, drop us a line at info@securitydelta.nl.
visible on larger screens only
Please expand your browser window.
Or enjoy this interactive application on your desktop or laptop.
Technological limitations of AI usage for law enforcement agencies
Technological limitations and challenges
Despite the benefits for law enforcement, the integration of AI faces several technical constraints that challenge its effectiveness and efficiency:
Data quality and accessibility are fundamental to the effectiveness of AI in law enforcement, but challenges arise from disparities in data collection and storage practices across jurisdictions. These variations result in inconsistent datasets that may be incomplete
or biased, compromising the integrity of AI outputs. Additionally, existing data often lacks the granularity required for AI applications, as it was not originally collected with AI in mind. For instance, police reports, though informative, may not capture unreported
or undetected incidents, skewing AI training and outcomes. Standardised data collection protocols, coupled with data cleansing and enrichment processes are essential for creating comprehensive
and unbiased datasets. Moreover, integrating robust data protection measures is crucial to safeguarding individuals’ privacy and ensuring compliance with applicable data protection regulations. By addressing these issues, AI reliability in law enforcement can
be improved, better reflecting and addressing the complexity of criminal activity while upholding ethical and legal standards.
Integration challenges: Integrating AI with existing law enforcement systems and data processing pipelines presents various technical hurdles. The incompatibility between modern AI solutions and older technological infrastructures can lead to significant integration issues, affecting data exchange and operational efficiency. Bridging this gap requires a dual approach: retrofitting legacy systems to enhance their compatibility with AI technologies and designing
future AI solutions with a focus on interoperability and modular integration.
Scalability and performance under different conditions: The effectiveness of AI tools in law enforcement must be maintained regardless of the scale of data or complexity of operational scenarios. Variability in incidents and environmental conditions tests the adaptability of AI systems. Addressing these challenges necessitates the development of AI models that are not only scalable but also versatile, capable of adjusting to different data volumes and operational demands without compromising performance.
Maintenance and technical support: The rapidly evolving nature of AI technology demands continuous updates and maintenance to safeguard efficiency and security. However, the requisite ongoing technical support can strain the resources of law enforcement
agencies, particularly those with limited access to IT expertise. Establishing dedicated support frameworks and leveraging partnerships with technology providers could offer sustainable solutions to these challenges, ensuring AI systems remain up-todate and effective.
Addressing these challenges is not straightforward and requires an AI governance framework and a concerted effort from multiple stakeholders. Collaboration between law enforcement agencies, technology developers, policymakers, and the community is crucial to navigate these technological limitations. Through such collaboration, innovative solutions can be developed, tested, and refined to enhance the efficiency, reliability, and overall effectiveness of AI applications in policing practices. Additionally, investing in research and development, focusing on ethical AI use, and fostering an environment of continuous learning and adaptation among law enforcement personnel are key steps toward overcoming these obstacles.